---Natural Language Processing for Medical Text Analysis | Research | Gregory Mikuro | Gregory Mikuro's Research Hub

Natural Language Processing for Medical Text Analysis

Gregory Mikuro

November 30, 2023

Cite this paper

Mikuro, G. (2023). Natural Language Processing for Medical Text Analysis. Medical Informatics Journal, 45(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1234/mij.2023.1130

Abstract

This research introduces a specialized natural language processing framework for medical text analysis, capable of extracting clinically relevant information from unstructured medical records, research papers, and clinical notes. Our approach combines domain-specific transformer models with medical ontologies to achieve 92% accuracy in identifying key medical entities and relationships, a significant improvement over general-purpose NLP models applied to medical texts.

Publication Details

  • Journal: Medical Informatics Journal
  • Volume: 45
  • Issue: 2
  • Pages: 112-129
  • Year: 2023
  • DOI: 10.1234/mij.2023.1130
  • Publisher: Healthcare Informatics Society

Introduction

The exponential growth of unstructured medical text data presents both a challenge and an opportunity for healthcare informatics. Electronic health records, clinical notes, research papers, and medical forum discussions contain valuable clinical information that, if properly extracted and analyzed, could enhance clinical decision support systems, facilitate medical research, and improve patient care.

Traditional natural language processing (NLP) models, while effective for general text analysis, often struggle with the specialized vocabulary, unique grammatical structures, and domain-specific contextual nuances present in medical texts. Medical language contains specialized terminology, abbreviations, and contextual relationships that require domain-specific understanding.

In this paper, we present a specialized NLP framework designed specifically for medical text analysis. Our approach leverages transformer-based language models fine-tuned on large corpora of medical texts, integrated with comprehensive medical ontologies to provide domain-specific context and relationships. The framework is capable of extracting entities such as symptoms, diagnoses, medications, procedures, and their temporal and causal relationships from unstructured medical texts.

Methodology

Our framework employs a multi-stage pipeline for processing medical texts:

  1. Text Preprocessing: Specialized tokenization and normalization techniques tailored for medical terminology.
  2. Named Entity Recognition: Domain-specific entity extraction for medical concepts using a fine-tuned BERT model.
  3. Relation Extraction: Identification of clinical relationships between entities using a transformer-based architecture.
  4. Temporal Analysis: Extraction of temporal information to establish chronological relationships between clinical events.
  5. Knowledge Integration: Mapping extracted information to standardized medical ontologies (SNOMED CT, RxNorm, UMLS).

The core of our system is a transformer model pre-trained on general text corpora and subsequently fine-tuned on a diverse collection of 2.3 million medical documents, including clinical notes, medical research papers, and health records (with appropriate de-identification and ethical clearances).

Results

Our framework demonstrates substantial improvements over general-purpose NLP models when applied to medical text analysis:

  • 92% accuracy in medical entity recognition (compared to 76% for general NLP models)
  • 87% accuracy in relation extraction between medical concepts
  • 91% precision in medication information extraction
  • 89% recall in identifying adverse events and side effects

The system’s performance was evaluated on three distinct datasets: (1) a collection of 5,000 de-identified clinical notes, (2) 10,000 medical research abstracts, and (3) 3,000 patient forum discussions about medical conditions.

Conclusion

The specialized NLP framework presented in this paper addresses the unique challenges of medical text analysis by combining domain-specific language models with medical knowledge resources. The results demonstrate significant improvements over general-purpose NLP approaches, highlighting the importance of domain adaptation in specialized fields like healthcare.

Future work will focus on extending the framework to support multiple languages, enhancing the temporal reasoning capabilities, and developing explainable AI components to provide clinicians with transparent reasoning for the system’s extractions and inferences.